<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti-porn porn.</title>
	<link>http://www.ordinarypornstar.com/archives/anti-porn-porn</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinarypornstar.com/archives/anti-porn-porn#comment-306</link>
		<author>Steve</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ordinarypornstar.com/archives/anti-porn-porn#comment-306</guid>
					<description>Plus you get fat stacks of cash when I click on your femjoy banner and sign up!

But yeah besides that I completely agree with the draw to this site, those three videos you linked in a previous post show that these guys have spent a some time hitting the books and doing their time as photographers and videographers. 

I guess I never realized even to a small extent how hard it is to capture visually pleasing photos and videos of the human body until I started making amateur porn with girlfriends. Your typical porno doesn't have to worry about having a top notch videographer, deffinately not up to the standards of Femjoy its more on the content than how its captured when a girl is getting 40 loads on her face. Both types of porn can be equally appreciated in their own ways but this site shows talent both in capturing and production.

I think Amateur Allure's production is up in the higher echelon of online pornography the lighting and microphone placement are the major selling point to having a subscription (in my opinion anyways). To move towards the same quality as a site like Femjoy I think your audio could use an overhaul, I find the volume low and the musical score repetative. The camera work is unique and I don't think changing that aspect would be a good idea. You are after all the performer and the videographer, perhaps you need to bring me on as the cock man and concentrate on your artistic growth yes I think that's exactly what needs to be done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plus you get fat stacks of cash when I click on your femjoy banner and sign up!</p>
<p>But yeah besides that I completely agree with the draw to this site, those three videos you linked in a previous post show that these guys have spent a some time hitting the books and doing their time as photographers and videographers. </p>
<p>I guess I never realized even to a small extent how hard it is to capture visually pleasing photos and videos of the human body until I started making amateur porn with girlfriends. Your typical porno doesn&#8217;t have to worry about having a top notch videographer, deffinately not up to the standards of Femjoy its more on the content than how its captured when a girl is getting 40 loads on her face. Both types of porn can be equally appreciated in their own ways but this site shows talent both in capturing and production.</p>
<p>I think Amateur Allure&#8217;s production is up in the higher echelon of online pornography the lighting and microphone placement are the major selling point to having a subscription (in my opinion anyways). To move towards the same quality as a site like Femjoy I think your audio could use an overhaul, I find the volume low and the musical score repetative. The camera work is unique and I don&#8217;t think changing that aspect would be a good idea. You are after all the performer and the videographer, perhaps you need to bring me on as the cock man and concentrate on your artistic growth yes I think that&#8217;s exactly what needs to be done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinarypornstar.com/archives/anti-porn-porn#comment-307</link>
		<author>Thomas</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ordinarypornstar.com/archives/anti-porn-porn#comment-307</guid>
					<description>You are a very perceptive reader, my man.

Aside from the "fat stacks of cash" comment that is. Think, really "checks that are hardly worth a trip to the bank to cash" and you'll be a lot closer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are a very perceptive reader, my man.</p>
<p>Aside from the &#8220;fat stacks of cash&#8221; comment that is. Think, really &#8220;checks that are hardly worth a trip to the bank to cash&#8221; and you&#8217;ll be a lot closer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinarypornstar.com/archives/anti-porn-porn#comment-308</link>
		<author>Steve</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ordinarypornstar.com/archives/anti-porn-porn#comment-308</guid>
					<description>Fat stacks of sarcasm!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fat stacks of sarcasm!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: capital</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinarypornstar.com/archives/anti-porn-porn#comment-309</link>
		<author>capital</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ordinarypornstar.com/archives/anti-porn-porn#comment-309</guid>
					<description>you are right Steve - porn is all about money - where women can make more money than the men who only provide the equipment but even Thomas is sounding jaded! the equipment showing signs or wearing out perhaps??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are right Steve - porn is all about money - where women can make more money than the men who only provide the equipment but even Thomas is sounding jaded! the equipment showing signs or wearing out perhaps??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinarypornstar.com/archives/anti-porn-porn#comment-310</link>
		<author>Thomas</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 09:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ordinarypornstar.com/archives/anti-porn-porn#comment-310</guid>
					<description>Now, now Capital.

There is a similarity between porn and rap music. Ownership is EVERYTHING. Take gander at a story like this:

http://www.lukeisback.com/stars/stars/kara_bare.htm

Yes, this little cutie made $1000 a day at a few shoots, but what good did it do her? Nada thing.

Capital there is still a tiny little bit of art in porn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, now Capital.</p>
<p>There is a similarity between porn and rap music. Ownership is EVERYTHING. Take gander at a story like this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lukeisback.com/stars/stars/kara_bare.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.lukeisback.com/stars/stars/kara_bare.htm</a></p>
<p>Yes, this little cutie made $1000 a day at a few shoots, but what good did it do her? Nada thing.</p>
<p>Capital there is still a tiny little bit of art in porn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinarypornstar.com/archives/anti-porn-porn#comment-313</link>
		<author>Steve</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ordinarypornstar.com/archives/anti-porn-porn#comment-313</guid>
					<description>In case there's any confusion my sarcasm bit was directed towards myself, ccbill referalls don't pay for themselves in the effort they take to put up most of the time...

But since we are on the topic, Its hard to get rich makin $1000 a shoot when you don't know when or where the next shoot is commin from and you hold zero rights to the content. What AA provides the content holder (Thomas) is recursive income which can pay for a couple mortgages or maybe even a few italian sports cars.

Sites like AA or Femjoy deserve a lot of repsect for the kind of content they are producing, Capital I assume since you post on here you hold a subscription to AA? Or have in the past? Other than these few sites most content that caters to this audience is the amateur stuff made by couples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case there&#8217;s any confusion my sarcasm bit was directed towards myself, ccbill referalls don&#8217;t pay for themselves in the effort they take to put up most of the time&#8230;</p>
<p>But since we are on the topic, Its hard to get rich makin $1000 a shoot when you don&#8217;t know when or where the next shoot is commin from and you hold zero rights to the content. What AA provides the content holder (Thomas) is recursive income which can pay for a couple mortgages or maybe even a few italian sports cars.</p>
<p>Sites like AA or Femjoy deserve a lot of repsect for the kind of content they are producing, Capital I assume since you post on here you hold a subscription to AA? Or have in the past? Other than these few sites most content that caters to this audience is the amateur stuff made by couples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinarypornstar.com/archives/anti-porn-porn#comment-314</link>
		<author>Thomas</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ordinarypornstar.com/archives/anti-porn-porn#comment-314</guid>
					<description>You're right about CCBill's interface. I often put tracking links up to see how many people click around, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right about CCBill&#8217;s interface. I often put tracking links up to see how many people click around, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
